| Summaries and Customer Reviews are supplied by Amazon.com Packed with 2,000 logos from world-class designers.This book takes all the logos that were in Rockport PublisheréÆs best-seller, Logo Lounge 2, and collects them in one small, neat, pictorial handbook for easy reference. There are no lengthy case histories, just logos, logos, and more logos. ItéÆs a fast-paced book featuring one to six logos per page to allow designers to easily shop for ideas. Logos are among the most important elements a designer can create, so it is no surprise that they are always looking for new, fresh ideas. LogoLounge 2 delivers just that. Its predecessor showcased the logos along with the stories of how they came to be; this compact version puts the spotlight on the logos alone, making it the perfect handbook to logo design. Average Customer Rating: Tons of Designs | Customer Rating: | | Lots of pictures of different logos and the book is arranged in a very orderly manner. Excellent book! | Great series of books! | Customer Rating: | | I'm very impressed with the wide array and organization of this book (and the others in the series). Such great colors, and layout... everything just makes me want to study every last detail on every last page. I've bought the first two... and have added the third one to my wish list. If you want to be a good logo designer but experience "designer's block," this should get you over that hump. Thanks, Bill Gardner, and all the fabulous designers who were featured in the book! | Well edited | Customer Rating: | | Well printed, well edited and an excellent resource for designers and creative individuals. | Very Helpful | Customer Rating: | | Great for idea gathering and inspiration. It keeps you up to date with the newest logo designs. | Disappointing sequel | Customer Rating: | | Logo Lounge 1 is a must-have in my design library - I refer to it often. Unfortunately Logo Lounge 2 seems lackluster, uninspired, and disappointing. While it contains the same quantity of logos as the first book, the solutions are much less imaginative and the profile section at the beginning is too long and the designers profiled, and their work, are difficult to relate to. | | |